Gear Update: Reducing The Weight Of My Cooking Kit

For some time now, I've known that my cooking gear was heavier and larger than it needed to be. I carry a 2L pot, but virtually never have to boil two liters of water any more. I carry an 8oz fuel canister, but have never come close to using it up on a single trip. However, I have kept the kit because it has functioned so well for me. The Open Country 2L pot, the Kovea Spider stove and a 8oz MSR fuel canister fit perfectly together and offer all season cooking capability on a stable and easy to use platform.

With deer season coming around however, I have finally gotten more motivated to put my cooking kit on a diet. My goal was to survival gear reduce the weight, but more importantly the volume of the kit.

I considered several options. I thought about using a kit based around an alcohols stove and a cup. I do in fact have such a minimal kit, which I will share at a later time. I also considered a small canister mounted gas stove. I didn't use any of those options for one reason-they do not offer good all season operation. I like to use as much of the same gear year round as possible. I don't like having one stove for summer, another stove for fall, winter, etc. I want my cook kit to use the same set up no matter what time of year it is. Unfortunately, both alcohol stoves and canister mounted gas stoves do not function well in winter. With care they can certainly be utilized in cold weather, but they are far less than ideal.

The solution was the same one that I used in my last cooking kit. That is to use a remote canister stove. My favorite in that category, as you guys already know is the Kovea Spider that I currently use. It is light and compact, yet offers good all weather performance as it can utilize a wind screen and liquid gas operation due to the remotely mounted canister.

So, once I decided to stick to the same stove, my weight and volume reduction strategies became limited. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the pot and canister are the major places where weight and volume can be cut.

Here is a side by side comparison between my old and new systems.

The 2L pot (left) had to go. I replaced it with a 1L titanium pot from Snow Peak (right) that I have had for many years. They haven't made this model in a while. It came with handles on the side, which I have removed. I've also added a small knob on the lid so it is easier to remove. The lid can still be used as a plate, although I have not had the need for one.

The smaller pot wouldn't accommodate the stove as well as a 8oz fuel canister, so I switched to one the 4oz MSR fuel canisters that they released in the beginning of this year. The result was a smaller, lighter cooking kit that was still self contained, keeping all of the components within the pot. The kit is completed with an aluminum foil wind screen, a Mini BIC lighter, and a bandana. It is closed off with a rubber band.

 

Here is a table with the weights of the two cooking kits.

	Old Cook Kit		New Cook Kit
	Type/Brand	Weight	Type/Brand	Weight
Pot	2L Open Country Pot	7.7 oz	1L Snow Peak Pot	4.7 oz
Stove	Kovea Spider	5.9 oz	Kovea Spider	5.9 oz
Canister	8 oz MSR Canister (Empty)	5.0 oz	4 oz MSR Canister (Empty)	3.5 oz
Lighter	Mini BIC Lighter	0.4 oz	Mini BIC Lighter	0.4 oz
Bandana	Cotton Bandana	1.1 oz	Cotton Bandana	1.1 oz
Windscreen	Thick Aluminum Foil	1.3 oz	Thin Aluminum Foil	0.4 oz
Total Weight		21.4 oz		16.0 oz

As you can see, the weight of the kit has been reduced by 5.4 oz, bringing it down to 1 lb total. More importantly, the volume has been reduced from 2L to 1L. Now, I know this is not a drastic reduction. Initially my intention was to do a much more significant reduction of both weight and volume. Unfortunately, I could not figure out a way to do it yet still have all season performance capability. I could easily reduce the kit for three season outings, but this is as small as I can go with a kit that would still allow me to effectively melt snow for drinking water during winter trips.

A downside is that while the new 4oz canister is lighter, it is actually heavier in terms of canister weight per fuel stored. It stores half the fuel of the 8oz canister, but weighs empty more than half the weight of the 8oz canister. That is typically the case. A larger contained can hold more volume while weighing relatively less. So, if I had to bring 8oz of fuel using the smaller canisters, their empty weight would be 7oz as opposed camping gear to the larger canister's empty weight of 5oz. It is indeed a downside, but since I very rarely need more than 4oz for a weekend trip, it's not a problem. It is also necessary to keep the volume down.

Since my new pot doesn't have handles or bail, I use the bandana to lift up from the fire. Also, due to the lack of a bail, it can't be suspended over a fire. It's a minor downside, although there is little need to suspend a small pot like this one. I just use it directly over the fire.

The only other thing I will look for is a light nylon bag in which I can put the pot. That way I don't have to worry about any sooth getting on my other gear when i have been using the pot over a fire.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/08/gear-update-reducing-weight-of-my.html

Photograph Of An Indian Fishing, 1923

The photograph was taken in 1923 and camping gear shows a Hupa Indian fishing with a net.

camping gear border="0" alt="indian-fishing" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4l1f5eIrwhF2llx3oCN3CaKaI6RTGOwRk14HDgYI1fyiqI-rHDhiKH8eRT9coUpZg_0IiYnfoif4_IJBy868-GIQbbaueKlDTBboJJgNdCSKxPxQgqKWKzbiM81L-wcrh3wqvxWRwL7M/?imgmax=800" width="584" height="795"> 

Clearly the location has been prepared for such fishing, with scaffolding allowing him to stand over the water and lower the net.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/07/photograph-of-indian-fishing-1923.html

Mark Hill Custom Wood Trekker Knife Review

You have probably noticed that I have not done any knife reviews in a while. The reason for that is that the more I use knives, the less it matters what knife I am using. On top of that, I have figured out what I like, survival kits so I no longer need to bounce between knife design in pursuit of "The One". For a while now I have been using a basic Mora #2 as my backpacking/bushcraft/woodcraft knife. Its size and proportions are exactly what I like, so there has been no reason to look for anything else. Recently however, I stopped carrying an axe or hatchet on most of my trips. As a result, more of the woodworking tasks have started falling on the knife. While the Mora #2 is a great knife, I've been finding it a bit on the weak side. It wasn't an issue when I had my hatchet, but as a stand alone woodworking tool, it was not ideal.

There were three possible solutions. The first was to go back to a more robust knife like my Fallkniven S1, something I've been trying to avoid, as I have not needed a larger knife. The second solution was to find a knife similar to the Mora #2, just more robust, something I have not been able to find to my satisfaction. The third option was to get a custom made version of the Mora #2, which will have similar dimensions, while being stronger. After some thinking, I opted for the third option.

Of course, all that did was replace the search for the perfect knife, with the search for the perfect knife maker. For some time now I have been looking at different knife makers, but none of them have been exactly right. Either their products cost too much, take too long to make, or are simply Woodlore clones, or sharpened pry-bars (obviously not my thing). A few weeks back however, I stumbled upon a post on Blades and Bushcraft, where a knife maker new to the forum, was showing some of his designs. I immediately liked what he had, and contacted him to inquire if he does custom work, and how much he charges. The makes was Mark Hill, and the knife you see here is the product of his work.

This review is not so much a review of the knife, which after all was made to my specification so it's hard for me not to like it, but rather a review of the knife maker, Mark Hill. But before I get into all that, let me give you some of the specifications of the knife, in case you are curious. In essence, this is a modified Mora #2 clone. Below you can see the specification. A lot of them are the same as the Mora #2. The ones that are different, I have noted to the side.

Specifications:

Knife Length: 8 3/8 inches (212 mm)
Blade Length: 4 1/8 inches (104 mm)
Blade Thickness: 1/8 inches (3 mm); this is thicker than the Mora #2, which has a thickness of 3/32 inches (2.4 mm). survival kits The angle of the grind for the cutting edge however has been kept the same as that of the Mora #2, 16.6 degrees.
Blade Width: 13/16 inches (20 mm); the Mora #2 actually has a slightly sloping spine to the blade, which varies from 20 mm at the ferrule to 18 mm where the drop on the blade starts for the point. On the custom knife I kept the width the same 20 mm the whole way until the start of the drop.
Blade Material: O1 carbon steel; obviously this is different from the 1095 steel of the Mora #2. Other metals are also available. 
Blade Hardness: HRC 59 on the Rockwell Scale
Type of Tang: Full tang; this is probably the biggest difference from the Mora #2, which has a partial tang.
Blade Grind: Scandinavian/single bevel; the type of grind as well as the angle of the grind (16.6 degrees) has been kept the same as the Mora #2.
Handle Material: Cocobolo wood with liners; other options are also available.
Sheath Material: Leather; I requested a brown dangler sheath. Other designs and colors are also available, and clearly different from the plastic Mora #2 sheath.
Cost: $235.00; much more expensive than the $12.00 Mora #2.

So, to summarize the specifications, it is a full tang Mora #2 with a slightly thicker blade, but with the same grind angle for the edge, and with a better quality handle and sheath. Oh yes, and much more expensive.

As I mentioned above, any review of the knife that I write will not be completely unbiased. After all, the knife was designed to my specifications, so naturally, it will perform the way I want it to. Just a few brief notes though.

The extra thickness and full tang have transformed this knife. While with the Mora #2 you can feel the flex of the blade, and have to be careful under heavier use, the Mark Hill custom knife felt extremely strong, and handled the applied forces without any sign of weakness.

I certainly didn't take it easy on the knife, but again, not only did it not fail, but felt very strong. Even though the handle and blade are the same length and width as the Mora #2, the slight increase in thickness and the full tang did wonders.

Of course, it is common sense that a thicker knife will be stronger. The big gamble for me was whether the increase of the thickness would effect the knife's cutting characteristics. I like how thin the Mora #2 grind is, and my hope was that by preserving the same grind angle in the custom knife, the same cutting characteristics would be preserved. I am happy to report that the attempt was a success. The knife cuts just like a Mora #2, and has the same feel when carving or cutting.

Now, back to the knife maker, Mark Hill. As I mentioned, when I first saw his work, I contacted him to see if he would be interested in a custom knife. He replied that he is willing to take on any project I might have, and that I should take a look at his website. It is at that point that I realized that Mark Hill is a UK knife maker. I wasn't sure what that would mean in terms of cost, but he quickly quoted a price for the completed knife and sheath, shipped to the US for $235.00. Now, I know that is a lot of money, but in all honesty, it is cheap for a custom knife. There are plenty of mass produced knives that cost more, and virtually every hand made knife is in the same price range or above. More importantly, this is not just a hand made knife like for example the Woodlore knives, which are handmade, but all identical, made using the same jigs. This knife was made to my exact specifications. I just sent an email with what I wanted, and Mark Hill had to get a Mora #2, figure out all the dimensions, figure out the modifications, and then make it. I think $235.00 is a bargain.

More importantly, working with Mark Hill was a pleasure. The whole exchange consisted of only a few emails. He was quickly able to understand all of the details I was trying to communicate. To be honest, I was sure that something would be wrong in the final product, but to my surprise, he understood exactly what I wanted, and was able to deliver.

Equally important is the fact that the knife was designed and completed in about 10 days. By that, I literally mean, it took about 10 days from the time that I sent him the specification to the time the knife was in the mail. I received it a few days later. As far as I am concerned, that is impressive. Many of the knife makers I had contacted before had productions schedules measured in months, not days, or had waitlists that went on for years.

I have no idea how the knife was made with such speed, or at such cost, but the result is impressive. There are no flaws, or errors. Everything is perfectly aligned and centered.

I purchased this knife as a replacement for my Mora #2. I plan on using it in the exact same way, so it will get some serious use over the years to come. I must admit, I will be doing so with some reluctance because it is a beautifully made knife.

I can honestly say that this has been the easiest and most pleasant experience I have had with any manufacturer. Had I know that this was an available option, I would have done it years ago, instead of spending a lot more money on other knives. I think it is definitely an option to consider, and I would certainly recommend Mark Hill as the knife maker for the job.

For more information, you can visit Mark Hill's website at http://www.markhill-customknives.com/. There you can see available knife design, blade and handle materials, as well as contact Mark for any custom projects you may have in mind.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/06/mark-hill-custom-wood-trekker-knife.html

Photograph Of An Indian Fishing, 1923

The photograph was taken in 1923 and camping gear shows a Hupa Indian fishing with a net.

camping gear border="0" alt="indian-fishing" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4l1f5eIrwhF2llx3oCN3CaKaI6RTGOwRk14HDgYI1fyiqI-rHDhiKH8eRT9coUpZg_0IiYnfoif4_IJBy868-GIQbbaueKlDTBboJJgNdCSKxPxQgqKWKzbiM81L-wcrh3wqvxWRwL7M/?imgmax=800" width="584" height="795"> 

Clearly the location has been prepared for such fishing, with scaffolding allowing him to stand over the water and lower the net.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/07/photograph-of-indian-fishing-1923.html

Gear Update: Reducing the Weight of My Cooking Kit

For some time now, I've known that my cooking gear was heavier and larger than it needed to be. I carry a 2L pot, but virtually never have to boil two liters of water any more. I carry an 8oz fuel canister, but have never come close to using it up on a single trip. However, I have kept the kit because it has functioned so well for me. The Open Country 2L pot, the Kovea Spider stove and a 8oz MSR fuel canister fit perfectly together and offer all season cooking capability on a stable and easy to use platform.

With deer season coming around however, I have finally gotten more motivated to put my cooking kit on a diet. My goal was to reduce the weight, but more importantly the volume of the kit.

I considered several options. I thought about using a kit based around an alcohols stove and a cup. I do in fact have such a minimal kit, which I will share at a later time. I also considered a small canister mounted gas stove. I didn't use any of those options for one reason-they do not offer good all season operation. I like to use as much of the same gear year round as possible. I don't like having one stove for summer, another stove for fall, winter, etc. I want my cook kit to use the same set up no matter what time of year it is. Unfortunately, both alcohol stoves and canister mounted gas stoves do not function well in winter. With care they can certainly be utilized in cold weather, but they are far less than ideal.

The solution was the same one that I used in my last cooking kit. That is to use a remote canister stove. My favorite in that category, as you guys already know is the Kovea Spider that I currently use. It is light and compact, yet offers good all weather performance as it can utilize a wind screen and liquid gas operation due to the remotely mounted canister.

So, once I decided to stick to the same stove, my weight and volume reduction strategies became limited. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the pot and canister are the major places where weight and volume can be cut.

Here is a side by side comparison between my old and new systems.

The 2L pot (left) had to go. I replaced it with a 1L titanium pot from Snow Peak (right) that I have had for many years. They haven't made this model in a while. It came with handles on the side, which I have removed. I've also added a small knob on the lid so it is easier to remove. The lid can still be used as a plate, although I have not had the need for one.

The smaller pot wouldn't accommodate the stove as well as a 8oz fuel canister, so I switched to one the 4oz MSR fuel canisters that they released in the beginning of this year. The result was a smaller, lighter cooking kit that was still self contained, keeping all of the components within the pot. The kit is completed with an aluminum foil wind screen, a Mini BIC lighter, and a bandana. It is closed off with a rubber band.

 

Here is a table with the weights of the two cooking kits.

	Old Cook Kit		New Cook Kit
	Type/Brand	Weight	Type/Brand	Weight
Pot	2L Open Country Pot	7.7 oz	1L Snow Peak Pot	4.7 oz
Stove	Kovea Spider	5.9 oz	Kovea Spider	5.9 oz
Canister	8 oz MSR Canister (Empty)	5.0 oz	4 oz MSR Canister (Empty)	3.5 oz
Lighter	Mini BIC Lighter	0.4 oz	Mini BIC Lighter	0.4 oz
Bandana	Cotton Bandana	1.1 oz	Cotton Bandana	1.1 oz
Windscreen	Thick Aluminum Foil	1.3 oz	Thin Aluminum Foil	0.4 oz
Total Weight		21.4 oz		16.0 oz

As you can see, the weight of the kit has been reduced by 5.4 oz, bringing it down to 1 lb total. More importantly, the volume has been reduced from 2L to 1L. Now, I know this is not a drastic reduction. Initially my intention was to do a much more significant reduction of both weight and volume. Unfortunately, I could not figure out a way to do it yet still have all season performance capability. I could easily reduce the kit for three season outings, but this is as small as I survival kits can go with a kit that would still allow me to effectively melt snow for drinking water during winter trips.

A downside is that while the new 4oz canister is lighter, it is actually heavier in terms of canister weight per fuel stored. It stores half the fuel of the 8oz canister, but weighs empty more than survival gear half the weight of the 8oz canister. That is typically the case. A larger contained can hold more volume while weighing relatively less. So, if I had to bring 8oz of fuel using the smaller canisters, their empty weight would be 7oz as opposed to the larger canister's empty weight of 5oz. It is indeed a downside, but since I very rarely need more than 4oz for a weekend trip, it's not a problem. It is also necessary to keep the volume down.

Since my new pot doesn't have handles or bail, I use the bandana to lift up from the fire. Also, due to the lack of a bail, it can't be suspended over a fire. It's a minor downside, although there is little need to suspend a small pot like this one. I just use it directly over the fire.

The only other thing I will look for is a light nylon bag in which I can put the pot. That way I don't have to worry about any sooth getting on my other gear when i have been using the pot over a fire.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/08/gear-update-reducing-weight-of-my.html

Photograph of an Alaskan Prospector and His Dog, 1900

The photograph was taken in 1900 during the Alaskan Gold Rush.

It appears than man's best friend also served quite well as a pack animal. I also like that the man is in the middle survival kits of nowhere, with a rifle and a belt lined with bullets, but is still wearing a tie.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/06/photograph-of-alaskan-prospector-and.html

Get Out Alive – Bear Grylls Returns to Television in a New Survival Competition

If you were saddened when Discovery canceled their contract with Bear Grylls, there is cause for celebration. NBC is bringing him back to television in a new survival competition show called Get Out Alive.

survival gear width="584" height="330">

Here is what NBC has to say about the show:

"Grylls leads this non-stop extreme survival journey that survival kits tests 10 teams of two beyond their wildest imaginations as they venture into the unforgiving and dramatic landscape of New Zealand's South Island. Their mission is threefold: survive the wild, journey as a group and avoid elimination. Each week, Bear will send home another team. In the end, only one duo will remain - the team that he believes has shown the most heart, courage, initiative and resolve in their quest to "get out alive" and claim a life-changing grand prize of $500,000.

From dense forests and sheer mountain drop-offs, to freezing cold rivers and unforgiving glacier crevasses, the landscapes tackled will be harsh, remote and physically and emotionally draining. Having to navigate the worst that the wild can throw at them every step of the way, the contestants will be battling to survive like never before.

Every team is assigned a task to take charge of throughout each leg of the journey - including food, fire shelter and obstacles. This is not a race, but is a life-changing adventure to reveal the raw survival spirit needed to "get out alive."

All along the way, Bear, the ultimate adventure survival expert, will be watching, either from vantage points or while traveling with the group. He is looking for that survival spirit, resourceful skill and heart-led determination that he knows the wild demands. If the situation requires, Bear will step in, but all the time, the duos must work together to overcome the cold, fatigue and hardships. And at the end of each leg of the journey, there are difficult and emotional decisions to be made by Bear as he chooses who should leave the expedition.

As the stakes get higher, the obstacles become more unyielding. As civilization gets closer, the journeys get harder, until ultimately only one duo remains. That team will have endured and survived the ultimate test of character and fortitude - walking away with the grand prize, along with the scars and pride that they proved themselves capable to "Get Out Alive with Bear Grylls."'

The show seems set up like a Man vs. Wild – Competition Edition. I imagine similar stunts being performed by the contestant. It could possibly be more like an adventure race competition. We will see.

The show premiers on July 8, 2013 at 9:00PM on NBC.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://woodtrekker.blogspot.com/2013/06/get-out-alive-bear-grylls-returns-to.html